Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy and Sacropexy Versus Hysteropexy Study

NCT ID: NCT02345954


Title
Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy and Sacropexy Compared to Uterus Conserving Hysteropexy: a Randomized Clinical Trial
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to compare the operative, anatomic functional outcome as well as the subjective outcome of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy and sacropexy compared to laparoscopic hysteropexy (conserving the uterus). The investigators expect that both laparoscopic procedures are equal in regards to operation time, complication rate, anatomic and functional outcome as well as subjective outcome.
Details
Conditions
Uterus Prolapse
Keywords
Uterus Prolapse, Laparoscopic Sacropexy, Laparoscopic Hysteropexy
Source
Kantonsspital Aarau
Sponsors
Kantonsspital Aarau
Status
Recruiting
Acronym
HysPex
Last Updated
06 Nov 2016
URL
Official Link
Citations/Publications
Sarlos D, Kots L, Stevanovic N, von Felten S, Schär G. Robotic compared with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Sep;120(3):604-11. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318265b61a.

Wu JM, Hundley AF, Fulton RG, Myers ER. Forecasting the prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in U.S. Women: 2010 to 2050. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Dec;114(6):1278-83. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c2ce96.

Khunda A, Vashisht A, Cutner A. New procedures for uterine prolapse. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013 Jun;27(3):363-79. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.004. Review.

Krause HG, Goh JT, Sloane K, Higgs P, Carey MP. Laparoscopic sacral suture hysteropexy for uterine prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006 Jun;17(4):378-81.

Price N, Slack A, Jackson SR. Laparoscopic hysteropexy: the initial results of a uterine suspension procedure for uterovaginal prolapse. BJOG. 2010 Jan;117(1):62-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02396.x.

Locations
Switzerland